1.
When gathering the data for the top 20% of
burglaries that were happening within the grid-based thematic map, I had 507
grid cells with different burglaries counts. I divided the 507 cells by 5 which
gave me the number 101.4. I rounded down to 101 which I made my selection of
the top 20% cells with the highest burglary count. The next map that created to
pinpoint high burglary crime areas was a kernel density map. The parameters that
I used for the kernel density analysis was 100ft for the output cell size and
the search radius to be set at 2640 ft. After using the kernel density analysis
tool, I reclassified the data and excluding any zero values. The mean number
was 35.16 which I multiple it by 3 which resulted as 105.48. Any number below
105.48, I excluded from the map and convert it from raster to polygon. I had to
use the select attribute tool to select features with the grid code of 1 to get
the final resulting hotspot map. In the final hotspot map that was created, the
Local Moran’s I was used. Before using the tool, the Blockgroups2009Fixed.shp
and the 2007 burglaries file had to be spatial joined and a crime rate field
had to be inserted into the data. The crime rate was determined by the number
of burglaries per 1000 housing units. After the Local Moran’s I tool was used,
the select attribute tool helped select the clusters with high crime rates.
No comments:
Post a Comment