In this week's lab, we
learned about the four different data
classification methods which in turn had different ways of presenting
the data
that was given. To make sure that we understand the material that we
read, we had to used ArcMap to present the four data classification
methods using the Miami-Dade Census dataset. We placed each
classification method in its own data frames which helped us compare and
contrast the different methods being used in this lab. By visually
examining the dataset through each classification, we were able to
determine which method would be most effective with presenting the
dataset that was given. The map that we first created from this dataset
was based on the percent above 65 data presentation which we then later
used to created another map utilizing the population count normalized
by area data
presentation. This allowed us see what presentation method was more
accurate in representing the data.
The map that I have
posted above is the Miami-Dade Census of people who are over the age of
65 utilizing the percent above 65 data presentation method to present
this data. This map could be use for Miami-Dade County Commissioners to examine the population of the senior citizens and by selecting the right data presentation will make the map more effective. The data presentation that
seems to depict the distribution of senior citizens accurately would the
percent above 65. This presentation allows the commissioners to have a general
idea what areas more heavily inhabited by senior citizens within Miami-Dade and
it gives a much greater visual impact of the population of senior citizens. The
commissioners might be able to implement more informed planning to come up with
projects to provide better resources to assist senior citizens within the
heavier populated areas. The population count normalized by area presentation
isn’t the most effective in presenting the data since it is not as visually
impacting as the percent above 65 presentation. The population count normalized
by area type of presentation seems to
show a reduce presence of the senior citizen community in Miami-Dade which might
lead the commissioners to not know the extent of the need by not having the
true percentages and this all caused by not using the most apt presentation. The map shows the four data frames with different
classification methods in each one. These data classifications are
called equal interval, standard deviation, quantile and natural breaks.
- Equal Interval: This classification makes the data have equal ranges within the classes that are created. To create these equal ranges, the total data ranges are divided by the number of classes which create the range values. With this classification, the data can be easily interpreted by anyone viewing the map. The down side is there being no limit for what data is being distributed along the number line within these classes.
- Quantile: In this classification, the data distribution is divided by an equal number of observations. The data values are then put into classes which are arranged in numeric order. With this method, the equal number of observation and the percentage of each class are the same which helps condense the need to farther discuss the mapped data. The down side is that this method has the same issue as equal interval; there being no limit for what data is being distributed along the number line within the created classes.
- Standard Deviation: In this classification, the area beneath the graphed curve is separated out into equal sections. Most of the observations will be placed into one class surrounding the average value; meanwhile the other classes will have less and less data markers as they moved farther out from the mean. This method of classification is very useful because the mean can be used as a dividing point which allows the viewer to see the contrast of values that are above or below the mean value. The down side of this method is that it can only work within the data that is normally distributed.
-
Natural Break: This classification uses algorithms
which are trying to make all the values within a class equivalent to one
another as much as possible; however, it also creates the opposite as well by
creating the equal difference in the class values.. In other words, the
variation of in-class is reduced and the variation of the inter-class is
expanded upon. In this method, the data breaks are visually selected in a
logical process. The down side is that this type of classification is
subjective which makes the data presentation vary between different mapmakers
and their take on the data.